The Geological Society of Malaysia (GSM) adheres strictly to internationally accepted publication ethical standards to guarantee excellence in its scientific publications. GSM employs peer review process to validate the integrity and novelty of the research work to increases the quality of research submitted for publication. After receipt of reviewers’ comments on an article, the Editor decides as to its acceptance or amendment or rejection. If the article is positively commented by the reviewers and recommended for its acceptance by the Editor, the authors are communicated regarding the same to further complete the prescribed formalities of copyright declaration. Upon completion of all the prescribed formalities, the authors are issued final acceptance for their manuscripts and it will then be published in the upcoming journal issue.

The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines on publication ethics is adopted by GSM to ensure the rules of good scientific is practiced. The reviewers and editors of the journal are highly expected to comply with the code of conduct for Journal Editors and Guidelines for Peer Reviewers as prescribed by COPE.

Essentially,
1.    Authors must confirm the following:

•    Submitted manuscripts must be the original work of the author(s); does not contain fabricated or falsified data or results;
•    The authors submitting their manuscripts to GSM are strongly recommended to adhere to the GSM Publication Guidelines for final submission of the manuscript;
•    Only unpublished manuscripts should be submitted;
•    Manuscript (or substantial sections from the manuscript) submitted to GSMJ is not already under consideration by another journal, or vice-versa;
•    Any conflict of interest must be clearly stated;
•    The sources of data used in the development of the manuscript is acknowledged; copying from someone else’s manuscript, or even one of the author’s own that has previously been published, without proper citation is considered as plagiarism;
•    All errors discovered in the manuscript after submission must be swiftly communicated to the Editor;
•    All listed authors must have made a significant scientific contribution to the research in the manuscript and therefore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results;
•    Significant scientific contribution, including students, laboratory technicians as well as the reviewers, must be acknowledged.

2.    Reviewers are expected to evaluate a manuscript for critical analysis, comparative analysis and most importantly for integrity and novelty of the research work.  As such, reviewers must confirm the following; that:
•    All manuscripts are reviewed in fairness based on the intellectual content of the article regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, religion, citizenry nor political values of author(s);
•    Any observed conflict of interest during the review process must be communicated to the Editor;
•    All information pertaining to the manuscript is kept confidential;
•    Any information that may be the reason for the rejection of publication of a manuscript must be communicated to the Editor.

3.    Editors must confirm the following; that:
•    All manuscripts are evaluated in fairness based on the intellectual content of the paper regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, religion, or political values of authors;
•    Information pertaining to manuscripts are kept confidential;
•    Any observed conflict of interest pertaining to manuscripts must be disclosed;
•    Editorial Board takes responsibility for making publication decisions for submitted manuscripts based on the reviewer’s evaluation of the manuscript, policies of the journal editorial board and legal restrain acting against plagiarism, libel and copyright infringement.