A New Approach of Adjustment Factor 2023 (NAAF23) for Modified Slope Mass Rating (M-SMR)

WG 50-2 reduced size updated 22.8.24
Author : Ismail Abd Rahim & Mohd Al-Farid Abraham
Publication : Warta Geologi
Page : 69-75
Volume Number : 50
Year : 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.7186/wg502202403

Warta Geologi, Vol. 50, No. 2, August 2024, pp. 69–75

A New Approach of Adjustment Factor 2023 (NAAF23) for Modified Slope Mass Rating (M-SMR)

Ismail Abd Rahim*, Mohd Al-Farid Abraham

Geology Program, Faculty of Science and Natural Resources, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

*Corresponding author email address: arismail@ums.edu.my

Abstract: The Modified Slope Mass Rating (M-SMR) system is a SMR-based geomechanical classification system utilized for rock slope characterization in the Crocker Formation. The M-SMR rating is derived from the sum of the basic Rock Mass Rating (RMRb) and an adjustment factor. However, it has been observed that the parallelism correction parameter, F1, within both the M-SMR and SMR systems, can sometimes be overestimated, especially for toppling failures when the discontinuity dip direction (αj) is less than the slope dip direction (αs). This study was conducted on six rock-cut slopes to not only evaluate the production of a convincing F1 value but also to introduce a simplified New Approach of Adjustment Factor 2023 (NAAF23) diagram for the M-SMR. This adjustment factor (F) includes four correction parameters (F1, F2, F3, and F4), similar to those used in SMR, but modifies the calculation approach for F1. The calculation now involves subtracting the higher value from the lower value among the discontinuity dip, slope dip, or intersection line orientations. The symbols A, B, C, and D represent the subtracted values, with A and B used when the discontinuity dip direction is higher than the slope dip direction and vice versa, and C and D used when the intersection line is higher than the slope dip direction and vice versa. For plane failures, A or B becomes the value, while for wedge failures, C and D are used. For toppling failures, the formula is 180 − A or B if A or B is less than 180, and A or B − 180 if A or B is greater than 180, eliminating the need for absolute symbols. A comparison F1 calculation using SMR is also conducted. The results show that F1 values become more convincing when using NAAF23.

Keywords: NAAF23, M-SMR, SMR, correction parameter, Crocker Formation

References

Alejano, L. R., Li, C., Muralha, J. & Perez-Ray, I., 2018. ISRM Suggested Method for Determining the Basic Friction Angle of Plane Rock Surfaces by Means of Tilt Tests. Rock Mech & Rock Engineering, 51(12), 3853-3859.

Anbalagan, R., Sharma, S. & Tarun, R., 1992. Rock mass stability evaluation using modified SMR approach. Proceeding of the Sixth National Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Bangalore, India, 258-268.

Bieniawski, Z.T., 1973. Engineering classification of jointed rock masses. Transactions of the South African Institution of Civil Engineers, 15, 335-344.

Chen, Z., 1995. Recent developments in slope stability analysis. Keynote lecture. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Rock Mechanics, Tokyo, 1995. p. 1041-1048.

Hack, R., 1998. Slope stability probability classification; SSPC. PhD thesis, University of Technology Delft. Delft, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Haines, A., & Terbrugge, P. J., 1991. Preliminary estimation of rock slope stability using rock mass classification system. In: Proceedings of the 7th Congress on Rock Mechanics, ISRM. p. 887-892.

International Society of Rock Mechanics (ISRM), 2015. In: Ulusay, R. (Ed.), The ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 2007-2014. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. 293 p.

Laubscher, D. H., 1990. A geomechanical classification system for the rating of rock mass in mine design. Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 90, 257-273.

Markland, J. T., 1972. A useful technique for estimating the stability of rock slopes when the rigid wedge slide type of failure is expected. Imperial College of Science and Technology, London. 9 p.

Rahim, I. A., 2011. Rock mass classification of the Crocker Formation in Kota Kinabalu for rock slope engineering purpose, Sabah, Malaysia. PhD Thesis, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.

Rahim, I. A., 2015. Geomechanical classification scheme for heterogeneous Crocker Formation in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah: An update. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Malaysia, 61, 85-89.

Rahim, I. A., Junaide Asis & Mohamed Ali Yusuf Mohd Husein, 2017. Sample type of tilt testing and basic friction angle value for the Crocker Formation’s fine sandstone of Sabah, Malaysia. Proceeding of Southeast Asia and Natural Resources Management 2017 (SANREM 2017) Conference, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.

Rahim, I. A., Sanudin Tahir, Baba Musta, & Shariff A. K. Omang, 2012. Adjustment factor for Slope Mass Rating (SMR) system: Revisited. Proceeding of National Geoscience Conference 2012 (NGC2012), 22-23 June 2012, Pullman Hotel, Kuching, Sarawak.

Robertson, A. M., 1988. Estimating weak rock strength. In: Proceedings of the SME Annual Meeting, Phoenix, Arizona. Society of Mining Engineers, Preprint No. 88-145, 1-5.

Romana, M., 1985. New adjustment rating for application of Bieniawski classification for slopes. Proceeding of International Symposium on the Role of Rock Mechanics, Zacatecas, Mexico, pp 49-53.

Romana, M., Tomás, R., & Serón, J.B., 2015. Slope Mass Rating (SMR) geomechanics classification: Thirty years review. ISRM Congress 2015 Proceedings, International Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Quebec, Canada, May 10 – 13, 2015. 10 pp.

Selby, M. J., 1980. A rock mass strength classification for geomorphic purposes: with tests from Antarctica and New Zealand. Zeitschrifts für Geomorphologie, 24, 31-51.

Ünal, E., 1996. Modified rock mass classification: M-RMR system. Milestones in rock engineering. The Bieniawski Jubilee Collection, Balkema, Rotterdam. pp. 203-223.

Manuscript received 31 July 2023;
Received in revised form 10 October 2023;
Accepted 12 December 2023
Available online 30 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.7186/wg502202403

0126-5539; 2682-7549 / Published by the Geological Society of Malaysia.

© 2024 by the Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License 4.0