Hydrogeological challenges in drilling fractured hardrock aquifer in Kedah

Cover Front-1
Author : Prakasini D.*, Vijayan V.R., Zamani A.S., Alvyn C.M.
Publication : Bulletin of the Geological Society of Malaysia
Page : 57-70
Volume Number : 81
Year : 2026
DOI : https://doi.org/10.7186/bgsm81202606

Bulletin of the Geological Society of Malaysia, Volume 81, May 2026, pp. 57 – 70

Hydrogeological challenges in drilling fractured hardrock aquifer in Kedah

Prakasini D.1,*, Vijayan V.R.1, Zamani A.S.3, Alvyn C.M.2

1 VGX Sdn Bhd, Megan Avenue II, Block B, Level 8, Unit 1, Jalan Yap Kwan Seng, 50450 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
2 JMG, Level 9, Menara PjH, No. 2, Jalan Tun Abdul Razak, 62100 Putrajaya, Malaysia
3 JMG, Jalan Perak, Seberang Jalan Putera, 05150 Alor Setar, Kedah, Malaysia

* Corresponding author email address: prakasini.vgx@gmail.com

Abstract: This paper presents and discusses the hydrogeological challenges encountered during the drilling of fractured hardrock aquifers in Kedah, Malaysia. The project aimed at drilling 20 boreholes, each to a target depth of 200 meters, across various geological formations. However, initial drilling efforts faced several challenges, including high downhole pressure, fractured zone collapse, insufficient compressor capacity, and unexpected geological conditions, which initially prevented the boreholes from reaching the target depth. Several improvements were introduced to overcome these challenges, including modifying the borehole diameter, adjusting drilling techniques, and installing temporary casing until fresh bedrock was encountered. The most significant improvement was reducing the borehole diameter. Initially, a 10-inch diameter borehole was required to be drilled to a full depth of 200 meters, but difficulties arose when using the DTH hammer beyond 100 meters, especially in hardrock sandstone formations combined with high downhole pressure. A telescopic approach was used, where the diameter was reduced from 10” to 8” to continue drilling. However, this approach proved ineffective due to the water pressure/flow rate decrease when discharge water transitioned from the 8” to the 10” diameter opening, which prevented effective flushing of the drill cuttings to the surface. Ultimately, it was decided to drill an 8” diameter borehole directly from a 10” temporary casing to a depth of 200 meters with no telescoping. This approach succeeded and allowed the team to reach the target depth in all subsequent boreholes, even in fractured formations. Another factor that aided in achieving the 200 meters target depth was improving drilling speed, particularly in poorly consolidated lithologies such as interbedded mudstone formations, to prevent borehole wall collapse. Effective drilling in these fractured formations requires skillful drillers, well-maintained equipment, and experienced hydrogeologists on site.

This paper highlights the importance of proper well design and development, emphasizing the need for appropriate techniques before PVC installation to optimise and sustain yield during pumping. Additionally, the use of downhole geophysical tools to capture subsurface conditions including the location of major fractures contributed to a more efficient well design process. With these adaptations and proper well development, the subsequent 10 boreholes were successfully drilled to the target depth of 200 meters, providing valuable insight into groundwater dynamics in Kedah’s fractured hardrock hydrogeology.

Keywords: Groundwater drilling, hardrock aquifer, drilling techniques, well development, hydrogeology, Kedah

References

Adelana, M.A.S., Xu, Y. & Adams, S., 2006. Identifying sources and mechanism of groundwater recharge in the Cape Flats, South Africa: Implications for sustainable resource management. Proc. 34, Congress of the International Association of Hydrogeologists (IAH), Beijing, China, 9-13 October 2006.

Agarwal, R.G., 1980. A new method to account for producing time effects when drawdown type curves are used to analyse pressure buildup and other test data. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, September 1980. https://doi.org/10.2118/9289-MS.

Ahmad, A., & Tan, K., 2021. Water resources study and modelling at North Kedah: A case of Kubang Pasu and Padang Terap water supply schemes. Water Resources and Modelling, 1(1), 1–15.

Bierschenk, W.H., 1963. Determining well efficiency by multiple step-drawdown tests. International Association of Scientific Hydrology, Wallingford, UK. pp. 493–507.

Chen, Y., & Abdullah, M., 2022. Resistivity-chargeability relationships for subsurface characterisation in tropical granitic environments. Geoscience Frontiers, 13(4), 123–135.

Cooper, H.H., & Jacob, C.E., 1946. A generalised graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarising well-field history. Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 27(4), 526–534.

Hantush, M.S., 1964. Hydraulics of wells. In: Chow, V.T. (Ed.), Advances in Hydroscience. Academic Press, New York. 305 p.

KKM (Ministry of Health Malaysia), 2004. National standard for drinking water quality (2nd ed.). Engineering Services Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia.

Kumar, M., Singh, S.K., Kundu, A., Tyagi, K., Menon, J., Frederick, A., Raj, A. & Lal, D., 2022. GIS-based multi-criteria approach to delineate groundwater prospect zone and its sensitivity analysis. Applied Water Science, 12(71), 1–14.

Lloyd, J.W., 1969. The hydrogeology of the southern desert of Jordan. UNDP/FAO Tech. Report No. 1, Special Fund 212. Rome, Italy. 120 p.

Silva, A.B., Santos, J.M., & Oliveira, R.C., 2020. Site-specific drilling approaches and risk mitigation of well failure in hardrock aquifers. Journal of Hydrology, 582, 124512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124512.

Theis, C.V., 1935. The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage. Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 16, 519–524.

WEPA (Water Environment Partnership in Asia), 2021. Outlook on Water Environmental Management in Asia. Ministry of the Environment, Japan. 146 p. Available at: https://wepa-db.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/WEPA_outlook2021_e.pdf. ISBN: 978-4-88788-250-8.

Walton, W.C., 1962. Selected analytical methods for well and aquifer evaluation. Illinois State Water Survey Bulletin volume 49. 81 p.

Zulkifli, A., 2022. JMG carrying out comprehensive studies to explore Kedah’s underground water. New Straits Times, 22 March 2022.  https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2022/03/782113/jmg-carrying-out-comprehensive-studies-explore-kedahs-underground-water.

Manuscript received 3 January 2025;
Received in revised form 11 March 2025;
Accepted 30 April 2025
Available online 29 May 2026

https://doi.org/10.7186/bgsm81202606

0126-6187; 2637-109X / Published by the Geological Society of Malaysia.
© 2026 by the Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License 4.0.